Study on the British System of Remedies for Non-pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury& Concurrently on Establishing Relevant Systems in China 英国人身伤害之非金钱损失赔偿制度研究&兼论对我国相关制度的构建
Generally, non-pecuniary loss caused by breach of contract can not be compensated in traditional civil law. 在传统民法上,对于违约所致的非财产损害,一般不予赔偿。
In the past, scholars generally think that non-pecuniary loss is not recoverable in contract as in tort. In the author's opinion, it is not necessary to deal with compensation for medical malpractice only in the scope of theories in tort. 过去,国内外学者普遍认为非财产性损害赔偿问题只能发生在侵权责任中,本文对这种观点的合理性提出质疑。
LOSS AND GAIN In China, it is generally thought that non-pecuniary loss is not recoverable in contract as in torts. 在中国人们普遍认为非财产损害赔偿问题只能发生在侵权责任中,在违约之诉中不赔偿当事人因他人违约而遭受的精神损害。
In china, there exist some disputes and thus no relevant provisions in the academic circles with regard to the non-pecuniary loss compensation in breach of contract. 在我国关于违约的非财产损害赔偿学界存在争议且无相关规定,使法院在旅游合同非财产损害赔偿的判例中表现出较大的自由裁量权。
The author concludes that compensation for non-pecuniary loss is not belong to the field of tort law as a tradition permanently. 在总结前五章的基础上,得出本文结论:非财产损害并不是先验地永恒地属于侵权法领域。
Their attitudes are from denial to approve, and it has become the trend of modern legislation to allow the non-pecuniary loss in some special contracts. 通过考察发现各国对非财产损害之违约救济都经历了由消极到积极,由否定到肯定的过程,肯定特殊类型合同中的非财产损害已成为现代立法发展趋势。